We present an economic argument for restraining certain voluntary agreement
s. We identify a class of situations where single individuals or parties ma
y use the freedom to contract to subtly manipulate large groups of individu
als by offering them contracts that promote free-riding behavior. We provid
e three examples where placing restrictions on the freedom to contract may
prove beneficial. The first example provides a rationale for the prohibitio
n of exclusionary contracts. We point to the role most favored nation claus
es may play in facilitating such inefficient exclusionary practices. The se
cond example provides justification for prohibiting employers from proposin
g to compensate workers for committing not to join a labor union. The third
example provides a rationale for the ban against vote trading.