A flow cytometric method performing a five-part leukocyte differential
based on three-color staining with anti-CD45-fluorescein isothiocyana
te (FITC), anti-CD-14-phycoerythrin (PE)/Cy5, and a cocktail of PE-lab
eled anti-CD2, anti-CD16, and anti-HLA-DR antibodies was evaluated. Re
sults obtained by using three different sample preparation procedures
and two different flow cytometers were compared with those of a 1,000-
cell manual differential for evaluation of accuracy. We observed excel
lent correlations with the manual differential for all leukocyte subcl
asses and even higher correlations between the different flow cytometr
ic methods. Flow cytometric basophil results were identical to the man
ual counts, regardless of which sample preparation technique or flow c
ytometer was used. Therefore, we propose our flow cytometric method as
the first acceptable automated reference method for basophil counting
. The flow cytometric results for the other leukocyte subclasses were
apparently influenced by the sample preparation, which could not be ex
plained by cell loss during washing steps. Moreover, a small influence
of the flow cytometer was also observed. Assessing the influence of s
ample storage, we found only minimal changes within 24 h. In establish
ing reference values, high precision of flow cytometric results facili
tated detection of a significantly higher monocyte count for males (re
lative count: 7.08 +/- 1.73% vs. 6.44 +/- 1.33%, P < 0.05; absolute co
unt: 0.536 +/- 0.181 x 10(9)/liter vs. 0.456 +/- 139 x 10(9)/liter, P
< 0.01). Our data indicate that monoclonal antibody-based flow cytomet
ry is a highly suitable reference method for the five-part differentia
l: It also shows, however, that studies will have to put more emphasis
on methodological issues to define a method that shows a high interla
boratory reproducibility. (C) 1997 Wiley-Liss, Inc.