Three studies were conducted to examine the validity of the Worker Pole Int
erview (WRI), a semi-structured interview and rating scab designed to asses
s psychosocial capacity for return to work in injured workers. The first Ra
sch analysis study of 119 work-hardening clients with low back pain showed
that scab items worked together to measure unidimensional construct, except
for two work-environment items (work setting and boss); and the items were
logically ordered representing the least to most psychosocial capacity for
return to work. The second Rasch analysis study involved a refined scab (i
ncluding redefinition of environment items to reflect the worker's percepti
on of the environment) applied to 55 work-hardening clients with diverse in
juries. All items except perception of boss defined a unidimensional constr
uct. The ordering of items was similar to that in the first study and simil
ar across two different diagnostic groups (low back and upper extremity inj
uries), indicating the scale was sample invariant. The third study of 42 wo
rk-hardening clients examined the predictive validity of the WRI, A logisti
c regression, which included demographic variables (chronicity, diagnosis,
number-of-surgeries, attorney involvement and age), showed that none of the
variables predicted return to work (odds ratio ranged from 0.3-1.0). This
initial series of studies present a theoretically based instrument, which s
hows promising psychometric qualities. While the predictive study indicated
that the WRI was not useful in predicting return to work, this finding may
have been a function of the small n-size in the study or that the WRI may
mediate its effect through other variables.