Ta. Ehlers et Ma. Chan, Tidal sedimentology and estuarine deposition of the proterozoic Big Cottonwood Formation, Utah, J SED RES, 69(6), 1999, pp. 1169-1180
Mesoproterozoic to Neoproterozoic Big Cottonwood Formation of north-central
Utah contains some of the oldest known (similar to 900 Ma) examples of cyc
lic tidal rhythmites, Despite mild metamorphic overprinting, there is excel
lent preservation of sedimentary structures. The thick formation (4.8 km) h
as been previously interpreted as a shallow-water, intracratonic basin depo
sit, Five distinct facies are recognized. Two quartz arenite facies are dom
inated by dune (meter-scale) cross-bedding recording westward flow, but dis
tinguished by different large-scale geometries: (1) thick, tabular bodies (
10-20 m thick by 600+ m long) and (2) channeled beds (0.3-0.3 m thick by hu
ndreds to thousands of meters long). Channeled beds have scoured bases and
coarse-grained lags or rip-up clasts, Stacked channel beds form upward-fini
ng successions up to 50 m thick. Three distinct argillite facies contain di
fferent structures and cyclicities, and are also characterized by color. Da
rk, laminated argillites contain abundant heterolithic rhythmites (with thi
ck couplets up to 1 cm per lamina), syneresis cracks, dame structures, inte
rnal truncation scours, intraformational blocks/clasts, and diagenetic pyri
te. The other two argillite facies commonly occur overlying channelized qua
rtzites in large-scale upward-fining successions, A transitional argillite
composed of thin intertidal beds grades upward into mud cracked argillite o
f massive to weakly bedded intertidal to supratidal beds characterized by w
ave ripples and abundant mud cracks. Important diagnostic tidal features re
cognized in the Big Cottonwood Formation include: (1) heterolithic tidal rh
ythmites, (2) current ripples with crests rounded by backflow, (3) sigmoida
l bundles, and (4) abundant clay-draped reactivation surfaces. Other struct
ures that corroborate the tidal interpretation include: (1) flaser bedding,
(2) mud cracks, and (3) mud-draped wave ripples.
The sedimentary structures and genetic sequence relationships recognized in
this study suggest deposition in a tide-dominated estuary, The laminated a
rgillites with heterolithic rhythmites indicate subtidal deposition in tida
l channels. Sand filled tidal channels are represented in stacked quartzite
beds that grade to transitional argillite and thin successions of mud crac
ked argillite. Thicker units of mud cracked argillite may represent deposit
ion in tidal flats with periodic exposure. Tabular sheet quartzites suggest
deposition as sand sheets near the mouth of the estuary. Our documentation
of tidal rhythmites and estuarine deposition suggests previously unrecogni
zed Mesoproterozoic to Neoproterozoic tidal deposition in north central Uta
h.