The dispute-about the external sphincter and the urogenital diaphragm

Citation
W. Dorschner et al., The dispute-about the external sphincter and the urogenital diaphragm, J UROL, 162(6), 1999, pp. 1942-1945
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Urology & Nephrology","da verificare
Journal title
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
ISSN journal
00225347 → ACNP
Volume
162
Issue
6
Year of publication
1999
Pages
1942 - 1945
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-5347(199912)162:6<1942:TDTESA>2.0.ZU;2-M
Abstract
Purpose: Basic scientific facts, such as anatomical structures, are rarely subjected to critical reappraisal. Nevertheless, several clinical phenomena exist which are inconsistent with the description of the anatomy of the so -called external sphincter muscle and urogenital diaphragm. Materials and Methods: We performed a global examination of the anatomy of the entire lower urinary tract in 50 male autopsy specimens. For comparison magnetic resonance imaging of the same regions was performed on 12 healthy patients. Results: Direct comparison of the results of both methods revealed the exac t same topography of the bladder neck. The external sphincter or musculus s phincter urethrae is an independent morphological unit separated from the s urrounding pelvic floor muscles by connective tissue. Conclusions: The musculus transversus perinei profundus or deep transverse perineal muscle, which is believed to constitute the major element of the u rogenital diaphragm, does not exist. There is histomorphological evidence t hat the external sphincter consists of a striated (musculus sphincter ureth rae transversostriatus) and smooth muscle (musculus sphincter urethrae glab er) component.