Jc. Whitbeck et al., The major neutralizing antigenic site on herpes simplex virus glycoproteinD overlaps a receptor-binding domain, J VIROLOGY, 73(12), 1999, pp. 9879-9890
Herpes simplex virus (HSV) entry is dependent on the interaction of virion
glycoprotein D (gD) with one of several cellular receptors. We previously s
hell-ed that go binds specifically to two structurally dissimilar receptors
, HveA and HveC. We have continued our studies by using (i) a panel of bacu
lovirus-produced go molecules with various C-terminal truncations and (ii)
a series of go mutants with nonoverlapping 3-amino-acid deletions between r
esidues 222 and 254. Binding of the potent neutralizing monoclonal antibody
(MAb) DL11 (group Ib) was unaffected in forms of gD containing residues 1
to 250 but was greatly diminished in molecules truncated at residue 240 or
234. Both receptor binding and blocking of HSV infection were also affected
by these C-terminal truncations, gD-1(234t) bound weakly to both HveA and
HveC as determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and failed
to block infection. Interestingly, gD-1(240t) bound well to both receptors
but blocked infection poorly, indicating that receptor binding as measured
by ELISA is not the only go function required for blocking. Optical biosens
or studies showed that while gD-1(240t) bound HveC with an affinity similar
to that of gD-1(306t), the rates of complex formation and dissociation wer
e significantly faster than for gD-1(306t). Complementation analysis showed
that any 3-amino-acid deletion between residues 222 and 251 of go resulted
in a nonfunctional protein. Among this set of proteins, three had lost DL1
1 reactivity (those with deletions between residues 222 and 230). One of th
ese proteins (deletion 222-224) was expressed as a soluble form in the bacu
lovirus system. This protein did not react with DL11, bound to both HveA an
d HveC poorly as shown by ELISA and failed to block HSV infection. Since th
is protein was bound by several other MAbs that recognize discontinuous epi
topes, we conclude that residues 222 to 224 are critical for go function. W
e propose that the potent virus-neutralizing activity of DL11 (and other gr
oup Ib MAbs) likely reflects an overlap between its epitope and a receptor-
binding domain of gD.