M. Medina et al., CHARACTERIZATION OF CYTOCHROME-C(6) FROM THE CYANOBACTERIUM ANABAENA PCC-7119, JBIC. Journal of biological inorganic chemistry, 2(2), 1997, pp. 225-234
A soluble monoheme c-type cytochrome c(6) has been isolated from the c
yanobacterium Anabaena PCC 7119. It is a basic protein, with a molecul
ar mass of 9.7 kDa, which accepts electrons from Anabaena ferredoxin i
n the ferredoxin-NADP(+) reductase-dependent NADPH cytochrome c reduct
ase activity assay. The turnover of the reaction has an optimum pH at
7.5. Flavodoxin can also replace ferredoxin in this assay, but with on
ly 20% efficiency. Plastocyanin from Anabaena PCC 7119, as well as the
c(6) cytochromes from the green algae Chlorella fusca and Monoraphidi
um braunii are also shown to accept electrons from Anabaena ferredoxin
. The reduction potential of cytochrome c(6) at pH 6.7 was determined
to be 338 mV and is pH dependent, with pK(a)(ox)=8.4+/-0.1 and pK(a)(r
ed)approximate to 9.5. The ferric and ferrous cytochrome forms and the
ir pH equilibria have been studied using visible, EPR and H-1-NMR spec
troscopies. The amino acid sequence and the visible and NMR spectrosco
pic data indicate that the heme iron has a methionine-histidine axial
coordination in the pH range 5-11. However, the EPR data for the ferri
cytochrome are complex and show that in this pH range five distinct fo
rms are present. Between pH 5 and 9 the spectrum is dominated by two r
hombic species, with g-values at 2.94, 2.29, 1.43 and at 2.84, 2.34, 1
.56, which interconvert with a pK(a) of 8.4. The NMR data also show a
main interconversion between two cytochrome forms at this pH, which co
incides with that determined from the pH dependence of the reduction p
otential. Both these forms were associated with a methionine-histidine
heme-iron coordination by correlation with the visible and NMR spectr
al data, although having crystal field parameters atypical for this ty
pe of coordination. Anabaena cytochrome c(6) is one more example of a
heme protein for which the widely used crystal field analysis of the E
PR data (truth diagram) fails to unequivocally determine the type of h
eme-iron ligation.