Our purpose in this study was to determine the importance of the luminance
range of the display system for the detection of simulated masses in mammog
rams. Simulated masses were embedded in selected portions (512 x 512 pixels
) of mammograms digitized at 50 mu pixels, 12 bits deep. The masses were em
bedded in one of four quadrants in the image. An observer experiment was co
nducted in which the observer's task was to determine in which quadrant the
mass is located. The key variables involved in each trial included the pos
ition of the mass, the contrast level of the mass, and the luminance of the
display. The contrast of the mass with respect to the background was fixed
to one of four selected contrast levels. The digital images were printed t
o film, and displayed on a mammography lightbox. The display luminance was
controlled by placing neutral density films between the laser printed films
of mammographic backgrounds and the lightbox. The resulting maximum lumina
nces examined in this study ranged from 34 cd/m(2) to 2056 cd/m2. Twenty ob
servers viewed 80 different images (20 observations at each of 4 different
mass contrast levels) under each of the 5 luminance conditions for a total
of 800 independent observations per observer. An analysis of variance yield
ed no statistically significant correlation between the luminance range of
the display and the feature detection rate of the simulated masses in mammo
grams. However, the performance of the lower luminance display systems (les
s than 300 cd/m(2)), may be reduced due to the high levels of ambient light
found in many reading environments. (C) 1999 American Association of Physi
cists in Medicine. [S0094-2405(99)01811-8].