We investigated whether genetic differences in various forms of intraspecif
ic aggression and anxiety in four different genetic lines of mice (i.e. wil
d, outbred Swiss-CD1, inbred DBA/2 and inbred C57/BL6N) may reflect modific
ations in behavioral strategy. Experiments 1 and 2 used ethologically based
paradigms to analyze aggressive and anxiety responses both in social (i.e.
aggression) and non-social (i.e. novel environment exploration) contexts.
In Experiment 3, an anxiolytic drug (chlordiazepoxide (CDP)) was used to ex
amine possible differences in proximal mechanisms underlying anxiety-relate
d behaviors. The data show that intrasexual aggression, infanticide and mat
ernal aggressions are related and covarying. Genetic lines with the highest
levels of intermale attack (i.e. Wild and Swiss-CD1) also have highest lev
els of infanticide, interfemale attack and maternal aggression but, interes
tingly, the lowest levels of anxiety. In fact, exploratory behavior is lowe
r and risk assessment behavior markedly higher in DBA/2 and C57/BL6N mice (
i.e. the less aggressive strains) compared to Swiss and Wild genetic lines.
Although reproductive status influences anxiety levels in female mice, our
findings show that (contrary to previous studies) lactating mice are more
anxious than virgin females in terms of risk assessment activities. These d
ata demonstrate the importance of studying behavior in a more ecologically-
relevant context which emphasizes 1:he function of behavior in a specific s
ituation. Moreover, differential strain sensitivity to the behavioral effec
ts of CDP suggests that genetic lines of mice may differ in the underlying
mechanisms mediating behavior. It is therefore possible that artificial sel
ection of different genotypes has resulted in differences in proximate mech
anisms modulating the levels of aggression and anxiety, thereby leading to
modification of social behavior. Overall, the results presented here sugges
t that subtle genetic alterations in specific underlying neural mechanisms
are likely to cause profound effects on behavioral responses and their adap
tive significance. Implications for behavioral neuroscience research that s
eeks to understand both the proximal and ultimate mechanisms of behavior ar
e discussed. (C) 1999 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserve
d.