An example of what you can miss in single-event-effect testing, when you do not have a microprobe

Citation
Be. Fischer et al., An example of what you can miss in single-event-effect testing, when you do not have a microprobe, NUCL INST B, 158(1-4), 1999, pp. 245-249
Citations number
4
Categorie Soggetti
Spectroscopy /Instrumentation/Analytical Sciences","Instrumentation & Measurement
Journal title
NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION B-BEAM INTERACTIONS WITH MATERIALS AND ATOMS
ISSN journal
0168583X → ACNP
Volume
158
Issue
1-4
Year of publication
1999
Pages
245 - 249
Database
ISI
SICI code
0168-583X(199909)158:1-4<245:AEOWYC>2.0.ZU;2-9
Abstract
Following our work on simultaneous imaging of single-event-upsets (SEU) and single-event-latchups (SEL) in a static CMOS RAM with the GSI heavy ion mi croprobe [3], we tried to locate the addresses of the SEUs induced by a SEL event within one or more of the 8 bit-arrays on the chip. The result was t hat whenever we triggered a latchup by hitting a latchup-sensitive node, we always found multiple-SEU-events also in bit-arrays far away from the hit, although we made sure that the supply voltage drop during latchup (necessa ry to stop the latchup process and to prevent destruction of the chip) neve r went so low as to loose stored bits. Still more surprising we found these multiple-SEU-events also when we hit certain SEL-sensitive nodes though we did not detect SELs there. The reason for that process is still not fully understood [1], but the immediate lesson is that conventional, wide beam la tchup tests of integrated circuits may largely underestimate the occurrence of latchups and their accompanying multiple-SEU-events which are a big pro blem for error detection and correction. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.