Objective: To evaluate, in compliant patients, the pharmaceutical costs of
treating obesity with fenfluramine/mazindol, fenfluramine/phentermine, caff
eine/ephedrine, or mazindol relative to the pharmaceutical costs of treatin
g obesity-related comorbid conditions and reducing cardiovascular risk.
Methods and Procedures: Subjects were between is and 60 years of age with a
BMI of >30 kg/m(2). Pharmaceutical costs were evaluated in 73 of 220 subje
cts taking medications for diabetes, hyperlipidemia, or hypertension before
and after treatment using fenfluramine with mazindol or phentermine. The p
harmaceutical cost of weight loss, cardiac risk reduction, and low-density
lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol reduction was calculated for fenfluramine wit
h mazindol or phentermine, caffeine with ephedrine, or mazindol alone, and
compared to approved lipid-lowering medications.
Results: Losses of 6% to 10% of initial body weight reduced pharmacy costs
$122.64/month for insulin treated diabetes, $42.92/month for sulfonylurea-t
reated diabetes, $61.07/month for hyperlipidemia treated with medication, a
nd $0.20/month for hypertension treated with medication. Blood pressure and
laboratory evidence of insulin resistance improved in all medication group
s. Caffeine/ephedrine was most cost-effective of the three treatments in re
ducing weight, cardiac risk, and LDL cholesterol.
Discussion: Obesity medications produced a substantial weight loss in compl
iant patients and resulted in a net pharmaceutical cost savings compared to
treating obesity related comorbid conditions.