Performance rating and comparison of a group of entities is frequently base
d on the values of several attributes. Such evaluations are often complicat
ed by the absence of a natural or obvious way to weight the importance of t
he individual dimensions of the performance. This paper proposes a framewor
k based on nonparametric frontiers to rate and classify entities described
by multiple performance attributes into 'performers' and 'underperformers',
The method is equivalent to Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) with entities
defined only by outputs. In the spirit of DEA, the weights for each attribu
te are selected to maximize each entity's performance score. This approach,
however, results in a new linear program that is more direct and intuitive
than traditional DEA formulations. The model can be easily understood and
interpreted by practitioners since it conforms better to the practice of ev
aluating and comparing performance using standard specifications. We illust
rate the model's use with two examples. The first evaluates the performance
of employees. The second is an application in manufacturing where multiple
quality attributes are used to assess and compare performance of different
manufacturing processes. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserve
d.