OBJECTIVE: There is an ongoing debate on the prevalence of premalignant les
ions, in particular leukoplakia, at the time of diagnosis of an oral squamo
us cell carcinoma (OSCC). The aim of the present study was to determine the
presence of concomitant leukoplakia in 100 patients with OSCC, and to eval
uate possible differences in clinical and histopathological parameters of t
he OSCC between those with or without concomitant leukoplakia.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred consecutive patients, 61 men and 39 women
, with a histologically proven OSCC were screened on the presence of leukop
lakia. Four groups were distinguished: (I) leukoplakia adjacent to the OSCC
, (If) combination of leukoplakia adjacent to the OSCC, and leukoplakia at
another oral site, (III) leukoplakia present at another oral site, but not
adjacent to the OSCC, and (IV) no leukoplakia present.
RESULTS: in 47 (47%) patients with OSCC the presence of concomitant leukopl
akia was observed. Thirty-six (36%) patients had a leukoplakia adjacent to
the OSCC (groups I and II), of which eight (8%) patients (group II) also ha
d a leukoplakia present at another oral site. Eleven (11%) patients (group
III) had no leukoplakia adjacent to the OSCC, but a leukoplakia present at
another oral site. Fifty-three (53%) patients (group IV) with OSCC had no c
oncomitant leukoplakia present. No differences were noted between men and w
omen, nor was there any preference for an oral subsite with regard to the c
arcinoma There were no statistically significant differences in clinical an
d histopathological presentation of OSCC's between those with or without co
ncomitant leukoplakia
CONCLUSION: Almost 50% of oral squamous cell carcinomas are presumably asso
ciated with or preceded by leukoplakia Early detection and active managemen
t of patients with oral leukoplakia may prevent the true development of a n
umber of oral squamous cell carcinomas.