Recognition systems based on a combination of different experts have been w
idely investigated in the recent: past. General criteria for improving the
performance of such systems are based on estimating the reliability associa
ted with the decision of each expert, so as to suitably weight its response
in the combination phase. According to the methods proposed to-date, when
the expert assigns a sample to a class, the reliability of such a decision
is estimated on the basis of the recognition rate obtained by the expert on
the chosen class during the training phase. As a consequence, the same rel
iability value is associated with every decision attributing a sample to a
same class, even though it seems reasonable ro take into account: its depen
dence on the quality of the specific sample. We propose a method for estima
ting the reliability of each single recognition act of an expert on the bas
is of information directly derived from its output. In this way, the reliab
ility value of a decision is more properly estimated, thus allowing a more
precise weighting during the combination phase. The definition of the relia
bility parameters for widely used classification paradigms is discussed, to
gether with the combining rules employing them for weighting the expert opi
nions. The results obtained by combining four experts in order to recognise
handwritten numerals from a standard character database are presented. Com
parison with classical combining rules is also reported, and the advantages
of the proposed approach outlined.