Phylogenetic approaches to biological nomenclature are becoming increasingl
y common. Here I compare the behaviour of two such approaches, the phylogen
etic system of definition and the phylogenetic system of reference, when th
ere is a shift in the preference of phylogenetic hypotheses. The comparison
is based on a case study from nemertean systematics and is the first to co
mpare two different phylogenetic approaches throughout three stages of chan
ge, including two stages of phylogenetic nomenclature. It is concluded that
a phylogenetic system of reference in combination with uninomials is super
ior in conveying phylogenetic information.