The analyst's experience of patients' disturbances is explored as an aspect
of analytic technique. A number of premises are examined. First, it is exp
ected that the analyst is committed to tolerating and understanding disturb
ances evoked in him by his patients' personalities and their disturbances.
Second that he regards the disturbances evoked in him as a form of manifest
content to be understood in the usual method of association. Third, counte
rtransference attitudes may propel the analyst toward rapid formulaic conce
ptions of his patients' disturbances or to considerations of diagnostic des
ignations carrying serious, if not pejorative implications, such as borderl
ine, narcissistic, perverse or sociopathic. Such attitudes may also underli
e the urge to consider psychotropic medications in response to the patients
' disturbances. A selected review of the literature as well as illustrative
work with disturbing patients are presented in support of the paper's prem
ises.