Detection of micro calcifications in breast specimen by 4-fold DIMA directmagnification radiography compared to 1.5-fold conventional magnification radiography.
Jh. Grunert et al., Detection of micro calcifications in breast specimen by 4-fold DIMA directmagnification radiography compared to 1.5-fold conventional magnification radiography., ROFO-F RONT, 171(4), 1999, pp. 302-306
Citations number
18
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology ,Nuclear Medicine & Imaging
Journal title
ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN
The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy of 4-fold magnifi
cation breast specimen radiography (direct magnification, DIMA) compared to
conventional 1.5-fold magnification radiography in evaluating the presence
or absence of carcinoma at the surgical margins by detection of microcalci
fication. Methods: Fifty breast specimens with non-palpable microcalcificat
ions were examined during surgical biopsy using both DIMA (4-fold) and conv
entional (1.5-fold) magnification specimen radiography. The number of detec
ted microcalcifications of the whole specimen, of an area of 5 mm distance
to the margins and of the area of the suspicious cluster of microcalcificat
ions was counted and the results compared with the histological examination
as a gold standard. Results: In 50 specimen 2821 (1305 within 3 mm distanc
e to the margins) microcalcifications were detected with the DIMA mammograp
hy technique compared to 1608 (446) microcalcifications with the convention
at technique. This increased detection rate by DIMA-magnification radiograp
hy was accompanied by a decreased specificity in comparison to the conventi
onal magnification radiography (33,3% DIMA versus 83,3% conventional) regar
ding the evaluation of presence or absence of carcinoma at the surgical mar
gins. Differentiating the microcalcifications into calcifications belonging
to the suspicious cluster and those that are located outside the cluster l
ed to an increase in specificity (83,3 % DIMA versus 100% conventional). Co
nclusions: The efficacy of breast specimen radiography in evaluating the pr
esence or absence of carcinoma at the surgical margins by detection of micr
ocalcification is not improved by 4-fold magnification radiography (direct
magnification, DIMA) compared to conventional 1.5-fold magnification radiog
raphy due to an increase in false-positive results. Analysis of the attache
ment of the microcalcifications to the cluster can improve the specificity.