C-13 mixed-triglyceride breath test: Isotope selective non-dispersive infrared spectrometry in comparison with isotope ratio mass spectrometry in volunteers and patients with chronic pancreatitis
C. Boedeker et al., C-13 mixed-triglyceride breath test: Isotope selective non-dispersive infrared spectrometry in comparison with isotope ratio mass spectrometry in volunteers and patients with chronic pancreatitis, SC J GASTR, 34(11), 1999, pp. 1153-1156
Background: The C-13 mixed-triglyceride breath test (MTB) has been proposed
for the non-invasive assessment of duodenal pancreatic lipase activity. Un
til now, stable isotope analysis of CO2 of the MTB has been carried out wit
h isotope ratio mass spectrometry (IRMS). The aim of the present study was
to compare MTB results by using the new non-dispersive infrared spectrometr
y (NDIRS) and the IRMS. Methods: Ten healthy volunteers and 10 patients wit
h chronic pancreatitis and exocrine insufficiency were studied. After an ov
ernight fast each subject received a test meal containing 250 mg 1,3 distea
ryl, 2[C-13] octanoyl glycerol. Breath samples were taken at base line and
at 30-min intervals over a period of 6 h postprandially. The C-13/C-12 rati
o was determined in each breath sample by NDIRS and CF-IRMS as delta values
. Results were expressed as delta over base line (DOB (parts per thousand))
and as cumulative percentage dose of C-13 recovered (cPDR (%)). Correlatio
ns between IRMS and NDIRS were tested by linear regression analysis. For me
asuring agreement an Altman-Bland plot was performed. Results: A Linear cor
relation was found (DOB: y = 0.645 +/- 0.040 x + 1.496 +/- 0.089, r = 0.70,
P < 0.0001; cPDR: y = 1.269 +/- 0.031 x + 2.010 +/- 0.353, r = 0.93, P < 0
.0001). For DOE the mean difference (d) was 1.0 parts per thousand, and the
standard deviation (s) of the difference was 1.3 parts per thousand. The l
imits of agreement (d +/- 2 s) were -1.6 parts per thousand and 3.6 parts p
er thousand. Conclusion: The comparison of DOE and cPDR values by NDIRS and
IRMS shows a moderate to good linear correlation. However, the distance of
the limits of agreement is rather wide. Consequently, the validity of the
MTB is diminished, which makes MTB by NDIRS less suitable for exact evaluat
ion of noninvasive assessment of duodenal pancreatic lipase activity. Furth
er studies are necessary to determine sensitivity and specifity of the MTB
with NDIRS in larger study populations.