The effect of antenatal steroid administration on the fetal response to vibroacoustic stimulation

Citation
S. Rotmensch et al., The effect of antenatal steroid administration on the fetal response to vibroacoustic stimulation, ACT OBST SC, 78(10), 1999, pp. 847-851
Citations number
15
Categorie Soggetti
Reproductive Medicine
Journal title
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA
ISSN journal
00016349 → ACNP
Volume
78
Issue
10
Year of publication
1999
Pages
847 - 851
Database
ISI
SICI code
0001-6349(199911)78:10<847:TEOASA>2.0.ZU;2-I
Abstract
Background. Betamethasone transiently suppresses multiple fetal biophysical activities, including breathing movements, limb and trunk movements, heart rate variability, and heart rate accelerations. Unnecessary iatrogenic del ivery of preterm fetuses due to the false diagnosis of fetal compromise has been described in this setting. The sonographically observed startle respo nse of the fetus to vibroacoustic stimulation has been described as another modality to provide reassurance about fetal well-being. It is unknown, how ever, whether the startle response is also suppressed by betamethasone. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of betamethasone on this b iophysical parameter. Methods. A prospective cohort study. Vibroacoustic stimulation was applied to the maternal abdomen and fetal movement responses were sonographically o bserved prior to (0 hours), 48 hours after, and 96 hours after betamethason e administration. We recorded the presence or absence of the fetal startle response, and, if a response was present, graded semi-quantitatively the in tensity of the movements (vigorous versus sluggish). Results. Twenty-two of 26 fetuses (84.6%) displayed a vigorous vibroacousti c startle response prior to betamethasone administration, in comparison to three of 26 fetuses (11.5%) at 48 hours after exposure (p<0.0001). Eleven f etuses and eight fetuses displayed no startle response at all (p<0.0005), o r a sluggish response only (p<0.0005) at 48 hours, respectively. At 96 hour s after betamethasone exposure, no differences in the number of fetuses wit h a vigorous, sluggish, or absent response were observed in comparison to 0 hours. Stratification of cases by gestational age groups of 28-30 weeks ve rsus 31-34 weeks showed similar response patterns. Conclusion. Antenatal betamethasone exposure transiently suppresses the son ographically observed fetal startle response to vibroacoustic stimulation. Accordingly, this modality cannot be used for the ascertainment of fetal we ll-being of steroid exposed fetuses. Betamethasone seems to suppress centra l nervous system dependent biophysical activities, including the brain-stem dependent vibroacoustic startle reflex.