H. Einarsdottir et al., 110 subfascial lipomatous tumors - MR and CT findings versus histopathological diagnosis and cytogenetic analysis, ACT RADIOL, 40(6), 1999, pp. 603-609
Purpose. To evaluate whether liposarcoma, atypical lipomatous tumors and li
poma can be differentiated radiologically.
Material and Methods: We have retrospectively analyzed CT and/or MR images
of 110 subfascial lipomatous lesions. The amount of fat within the tumors w
as visually graded from the Images as: none, 1-75%, 75-95% or 95-100%. The
structure of non-fatty tumor components was compared. The images were compa
red to histopathology and in 37 cases to cytogenetic findings.
Results. Only 4 of 20 liposarcomas contained fat. All 4 lesions, histopatho
logically diagnosed as atypical lipomatous tumors, contained fat but less t
han 75% of tumor volume. All lesions with more fat than 75% of tumor volume
were histologically diagnosed as lipomas. However, one-third of the karyot
yped lipomas had ring chromosomes which are considered typical for atypical
lipomatous tumors.
Conclusion: When a tumor is composed more or less solely of fat, the diagno
sis of a lipoma or atypical lipomatous tumor with a phenotype simulating a
lipoma can be assumed. When the fat content is less than 75% of the tumor v
olume or non-fatty nodules are found, biopsies from different tumor compone
nts have to be performed to exclude malignancy. When no fat is found, imagi
ng does not help in differentiating lipoma or liposarcoma from other soft t
issue tumors.