Risk and criticality: Trajectories of regional environmental degradation

Citation
Re. Kasperson et al., Risk and criticality: Trajectories of regional environmental degradation, AMBIO, 28(6), 1999, pp. 562-568
Citations number
43
Categorie Soggetti
Environment/Ecology,"Environmental Engineering & Energy
Journal title
AMBIO
ISSN journal
00447447 → ACNP
Volume
28
Issue
6
Year of publication
1999
Pages
562 - 568
Database
ISI
SICI code
0044-7447(199909)28:6<562:RACTOR>2.0.ZU;2-F
Abstract
In its 1987 report, the World Commission on Environment and Development cal led for a global risk-assessment program to buttress and extend the work of the United Nations Environment Programme. This article reports on an inter national project centered at Clark University in the United States that has explored the causes and consequences of growing environmental risk over a 50-70 year period in nine regions distributed throughout the world. The nin e regions are: Amazonia, the Eastern Sundaland region of southeast Asia, th e Ukambani region of southeastern Kenya, the Nepal Middle Mountains, the Or dos Plateau of China, the Aral Sea, the southern High Plains of the United States, the Mexico City region, and the North Sea. The authors begin by con sidering the notion of criticality and developing definitions and a classif ication of environmentally threatened regions. Research teams were assemble d for all nine regions and studies conducted. In this article, the authors review the development of concepts and methods used in these studies and th e major cross-cutting findings that emerged. They argue that a growing disj uncture exists in the studied regions between the rapid rates of environmen tal degradation and the slow pace of societal response, threatening environ mental impoverishment and loss of options for future generations and escala ting costs of substitution in resource use and risk mitigation efforts.