Development of the biologically active Guglielmi detachable coil for the treatment of cerebral aneurysms. Part II: An experimental study in a swine aneurysm model
Y. Murayama et al., Development of the biologically active Guglielmi detachable coil for the treatment of cerebral aneurysms. Part II: An experimental study in a swine aneurysm model, AM J NEUROR, 20(10), 1999, pp. 1992-1999
Citations number
51
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology ,Nuclear Medicine & Imaging","Neurosciences & Behavoir
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Ion implantation is a surface-modification technolo
gy that creates a borderless surface on protein-coated platinum; this chang
e in physical and chemical properties on the surface of Guglielmi detachabl
e coils (GDCs) appears to enhance cell proliferation and adhesion. Our purp
ose was to evaluate the effect of ion implantation on GDCs in an experiment
al aneurysm model.
METHODS: GDCs were coated with either type I collagen, fibronectin, vitrone
ctin, laminin, or fibrinogen, Using He+ or Nei 1 x 10(14-15) ions/cm(2), io
n implantation was performed on these protein-coated GI)Cs (GDC-Is), A tota
l of 56 experimental aneurysms were constructed microsurgically in the comm
on carotid arteries of 28 swine. These experimental aneurysms were embolize
d with standard GDCs (n = 23), collagen GDC-Is (n = 11), vitronectin GDC-Is
(n = 6), laminin GDC-Is (n = 4), fibrinogen GDC-Is (n = 6), and fibronecti
n GDC-Is (n = 6), The animals were sacrificed at day 14 after coil emboliza
tion, The physical properties of the new coils (friction on delivery, deplo
yment into aneurysms, trackability, etc) and the development of tissue scar
ring and neoendothelium across the aneurysm's orifice were evaluated macros
copically and microscopically,
RESULTS: No evidence of increased coil friction/stiffness was observed duri
ng delivery of GDC-Is through microcatheters in this aneurysm model. A more
intense scar formation and neoendothelium at the neck of aneurysms were ob
served macroscopically when treated with GDC-Is, Significant differences in
the proportion of neck coverage between standard GDCs (48.3% +/- 20.5%) an
d all GDC-I groups were observed (collagen GDC-I-89.4% +/- 14.9%, P < .01;
vitronectin GDC-I-71.5% +/- 7.0%, P < .05; laminin GDC-I-76.5% +/- 11.0%, P
< .05; fibrinogen GDC-I-74.8% +/- 13.9%, P < .05; fibronectin GDC-I-87.5%
+/- 15.0%, P < .01). Light microscopy showed a cell-organized fibrous tissu
e bridging the aneurysm's neck when using GDC-Is, whereas only a fibrin-lik
e thin layer covered the standard GDC surfaces.
CONCLUSION: GDC-Is indicated a more intense inflammatory response in the an
eurysm body and dome and faster re-endothelial coverage of the neck of the
aneurysm. This accelerated histologic response may decrease the chances of
coil compaction and aneurysm recanalization, This technology may improve an
atomic and clinical outcomes in patients harboring intracranial aneurysms.