Background. Minimally invasive heart operation differs from traditional car
diac operations through the omission of a sternotomy, cardiopulmonary bypas
s, or both. Current concerns with minimally invasive operation include: ope
rative safety, learning curve, operative times, arrest times, and adequacy
of myocardial protection. While many of the protective strategies used for
traditional procedures may be applied to minimally invasive cardiac operati
ons, the safe applications of minimally invasive operations require unique
techniques of myocardial protection.
Methods and Results. Omission of extracorporeal perfusion may benefit patie
nts through attenuation of systemic inflammatory response, decrement in neu
rologic insults, and reduced bleeding complications. As a counterbalance, s
urgeons must consider long-term operative quality and level of myocardial p
rotection provided during beating heart coronary operation. Current issues
that must be addressed include: pharmacologic management, coronary collater
alization and ischemic preconditioning, the utility of intraluminal coronar
y shunts, and technical adequacy of the anastomosis. Nonsternotomy cardiopu
lmonary bypass methods utilize alternative incisions and "port-access" tech
nology, and may render more rapid patient recovery including: decreased pai
n, shortened hospital stay, and more rapid return to work. Altered strategi
es of myocardial protection in a closed chest environment must address: met
hod of cannulation, technique of aortic occlusion, rapidity and maintenance
of cardiac arrest, and cardiac de-airing techniques.
Conclusions. Previous obstacles to minimally invasive cardiac operations in
cluded limitations in operative exposure, inadequate perfusion technology,
and inability to provide myocardial protection. Recent advances in videosco
pic visualization and evolving mechanisms of myocardial protection may just
ify the expanding application of minimally invasive techniques. (C) 1999 by
The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.