Which is the optimal antiandrogen for use in combined androgen blockade ofadvanced prostate cancer? The transition from a first- to second-generation antiandrogen
Mf. Sarosdy, Which is the optimal antiandrogen for use in combined androgen blockade ofadvanced prostate cancer? The transition from a first- to second-generation antiandrogen, ANTI-CANC D, 10(9), 1999, pp. 791-796
Many physicians use combined androgen blockade in the form of a luteinizing
hormone-releasing hormone analog or bilateral orchiectomy in combination w
ith a non-steroidal antiandrogen to offer patients a potentially more effec
tive treatment than castration alone. Three non-steroidal antiandrogens are
available in the US, i.e. flutamide (Eulexin), bicalutamide (Casodex) and
nilutamide (Nilandron). Nilutamide offers patients no benefit over flutamid
e or bicalutamide and has the least favorable safety profile. Because of it
s short half-life, flutamide must be administered 3 times a day. Furthermor
e, flutamide therapy is associated with a relatively high incidence of diar
rhea, often intolerable for some patients. Bicalutamide is available in a c
onvenient one tablet, once-a-day dosing regimen, is at least as effective a
s flutamide and is better tolerated in terms of diarrhea. Therefore, bicalu
tamide would seem to represent an appropriate first choice in patients who
are suitable candidates for combined androgen blockade. [(C) 1999 Lippincot
t Williams & Wilkins.].