Jk. Turpie et al., Biogeography and the selection of priority areas for conservation of SouthAfrican coastal fishes, BIOL CONSER, 92(1), 2000, pp. 59-72
Prioritisation of areas for biodiversity conservation has been debated larg
ely in the terrestrial realm. In response to the increasing need for conser
vation efforts in the marine environment, this study compiles and analyses
available data on species distributions and compares different approaches t
o the selection of marine protected area sites for the conservation of Sout
h Africa's coastal fish diversity. Species richness decreases from Mozambiq
ue southwards to the Cape, due mainly to a subtropical subtraction effect,
and is uniformly low along the west coast. The number of species endemic to
southern Africa is also higher in the east than the west, and peaks in the
region of Port Elizabeth. Hotspot analysis does not provide a useful site-
selection tool in a linear (coastal) analysis, at least in the absence of a
bundance data. Cluster analysis shows that coastal fishes conform to the sa
me three biogeographical provinces as other marine taxa, although the zonal
boundaries vary between groups and are particularly difficult to determine
for fishes. Multidimensional scaling better illustrates the fairly even ra
te of species turnover east of Cape Point. The selection of sites at the ce
ntre and boundaries of vaguely-defined biogeographical zones is thus relati
vely difficult, and excludes several localised endemics. These problems can
be resolved by using complementarity analysis. In the absence of abundance
data, to avoid "reserving" species at the periphery of their ranges, a pra
gmatic approach is developed, in which data are refined to include species'
core distributions only. The roles of existing marine protected areas are
also considered in assessing future conservation needs. (C) 1999 Elsevier S
cience Ltd. All rights reserved.