This article supports two theoretical changes to models of comparative econ
omic voting. The first is that the distinction between expected and unexpec
ted components of inflation and economic growth is important. We posit that
Voters are primarily concerned with unexpected inflation and unexpected gr
owth since these changes have real income effects and serve as better indic
ators of government competence. Empirical analyses of data from nineteen in
dustrialized nations in 1970-94 reveal stronger electoral effects for the u
nexpected components of inflation and growth than for their overall levels.
The second innovation is the relaxation of the assumption of homoscedastic
ity, which led to the finding that the relationship between economic factor
s and incumbent vote has become more volatile over time and is less volatil
e when policy-making responsibility is more obscured.