G. Chaplain et al., Changing practice in systemic breast cancer adjuvant treatment in a well-defined French population, B CANCER, 86(10), 1999, pp. 855-860
Using the 2,208 non metastatic breast cancer diagnosed women who underwent
breast surgery from the 2, 432 first breast cancers recorded by the French
departement of Cote-d'Or cancer registry from 1982 to 1992, we described in
this well-defined population, the trend in breast-cancer adjuvant treatmen
t, and related practices with recommendations according to risk groups. Adj
uvant treatment was received by 44.1% of the 2,208 women. Inflammatory tumo
rs were systematically treated with chemotherapy. For the noninflammatory M
0 breast-cancer (2,167 women), the adjuvant treatment probability was mainl
y determined by the nodal involvement. After adjustment on the tumor- and h
ost-characteristics, time period was associated with increased probability
of adjuvant treatment in the whole group of patients and within each pN sub
group. In the group without nodal involvement, this increase was also assoc
iated with the SBR histologic grade. There was strong evidence of large cha
nges in breast-cancer adjuvant treatment. Clinical practices in the Cote-d'
Or region have paralleled the NIH recommendations. For node-negative breast
cancers, these trends appeared despite persistent uncertainty in the defin
ition of subgroups to treat Over time, the SBR histologic grade became an a
pparent factor of treatment. This use as a treatment indicator was done wit
hout validation in any adjuvant treatment trial. The simultaneous recommend
ation to treat with the absence of guidelines could lead to the treating of
an increasingly large group by extending the "high-risk" definition. This
could be a nan-optimal management of risk while putting strain on health ca
re resources.