Evaluation of an ultrasonic extraction method compared with the Soxhlet extraction method for the determination of polyaromatic hydrocarbons and n-alkanes in airborne particulate matter
A. Tanabe et al., Evaluation of an ultrasonic extraction method compared with the Soxhlet extraction method for the determination of polyaromatic hydrocarbons and n-alkanes in airborne particulate matter, BUNSEKI KAG, 48(10), 1999, pp. 939-944
An ultrasonic extraction method was evaluated for a GC/MS determination of
polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and n-alkanes in airborne particulate matt
er, compared with the Soxhlet extraction method. Three airborne particulate
samples collected at an industrial area of Kitakyushu City, a heavy traffi
c area of Kawasaki City, and Urban Dust (Standard Reference Material 1649)
were extracted for seven PAHs and eight n-alkanes by both the ultrasonic ex
traction method with cyclohexane-ethanol (3:1) and Soxhlet extraction metho
d with benzene-ethanol (3 : 1). Vehicle Exhaust Particulate (NIES No. 8) wa
s also extracted for the compounds by the two methods. The results of the t
arget compounds by the ultrasonic extraction method well agreed with those
by the Soxhlet extraction method, except for the vehicle exhaust particulat
e.