Ecological and physiological evidence suggests that motion should be very i
mportant in the vision of birds, as it is in human vision. However, because
of technical difficulties, and uncertainty about the suitability of curren
t video and computer technology for presenting moving stimuli to birds, the
re has been relatively little research on avian perceptual and cognitive pr
ocessing of motion. The present article first reviews what we know about bi
rds' processing of moving video images. Although the bird's eye view differ
s from the human view, static video images are effective stimuli for birds,
and pigeons can respond to apparent motion as though it was real motion. U
sing video images, birds have been shown to discriminate still from moving
images, between moving shapes, and between categories of movement. There is
some but not complete evidence of transfer between moving video images and
the real objects they represent. Movement may aid the process of feature i
ntegration, and it gives rise to some but not all of the cognitive effects
that it leads to in humans - for example birds do seem to track a temporari
ly invisible moving object correctly, but they do not respond distinctively
to causal movements. Secondly, the paper reviews some questions that are n
ow open for research, but have not yet been properly addressed, for example
the psychophysics of video images, the relative salience of movement cues
in pattern discrimination, movement after effects and the role of movement
in depth perception and individual recognition. There remain some things we
can never know about how birds see video stimuli, because of problems that
include the impossibility of sharing the subjective experience of any othe
r individual, or of entering into the perceptions of animals whose perceptu
al and cognitive processes and experience are different from our own.