This paper examines empirical evidence pertaining to perception of pictures
by human beings. It is particularly concerned with the evidence that withi
n the species differences are found between culturally disparate groups; an
d within such groups between subgroups differing in age and between men and
women. It is stressed that whether a stimulus can be regarded as a picture
depends on both the nature of the stimulus and the nature of the observer;
in addition the task which a subject is requested to perform is a crucial
determinant in any assessment of pictorial perception. In consequence stimu
li which are seen as pictures by some observers may appear to other observe
rs as mere meaningless lines and blotches or may evoke responses which woul
d be appropriate if the stimulus were the depicted object or scene but not
a picture; an infinity of intermediate responses is also available. Two cha
racteristics of pictures, their ability to evoke perception of depth where
none is present (eidolicity) and their ability to represent objects (epitom
y) are described and their relationship to the skill of pictorial perceptio
n is briefly discussed.