Frequency of liver disease in type 1 diabetic patients treated with oral antidiabetic agents

Citation
Ss. Jick et al., Frequency of liver disease in type 1 diabetic patients treated with oral antidiabetic agents, DIABET CARE, 22(12), 1999, pp. 2067-2071
Citations number
21
Categorie Soggetti
Endocrynology, Metabolism & Nutrition","Endocrinology, Nutrition & Metabolism
Journal title
DIABETES CARE
ISSN journal
01495992 → ACNP
Volume
22
Issue
12
Year of publication
1999
Pages
2067 - 2071
Database
ISI
SICI code
0149-5992(199912)22:12<2067:FOLDIT>2.0.ZU;2-E
Abstract
OBJECTIVE - We evaluated liver disease in conventionally treated type 2 dia betic patients to provide a reference against which reports of liver diseas e related to novel oral antidiabetic treatments could be compared. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - In this follow-up study patients with type 2 diabetes who were treated with oral antidiabetic agents were identified fro m the U.K.-based General Practice Research Database and were followed to de termine whether the) developed liver disease. The specific types and etiolo gies of liver disorders were determined. Incidence rates were calculated ba sed on the accumulated exposure time to oral antidiabetic agents. RESULTS - Among 44,406 type 2 diabetic patients, 605 had a computer diagnos is of liver disease with an incidence rate of 53.2/10,000 person-years (95% CI 49.2-57.6). Of the 605 subjects, 186 had nonsymptomatic, mild, and tran sient liver disorders; 249 had a predisposing condition; and 113 had anothe r cause for the disease. A total of 57 cases were possibly drug induced wit h an incidence rate of 5.0/10,000 person-years (3.9-6.5). Of the cases, 11 were attributed to other drugs, 8 were attributed to fatty liver disease of diabetes, and the remaining cases were attributed to uncertain causes. Ora l antidiabetic agents were continued in 51 of these 57 cases, and we could not rule out oral antidiabetic agents as a cause of liver disease in 2 case s with an incidence rate of 0.2/10,000 person-years (<0.1-0.6). CONCLUSIONS - In this population, the background incidence of liver disease was high. Most cases involved other systemic diseases that may cause liver disease.