This paper investigates the interaction between a privately informed firm's
contracts for labour and its contracts for credit. The analysis shows that
if the worker has no ex post outside opportunities, or if the liquidation
value of the firm is large, then the credit contract can always be state-in
dependent; if the worker has outside opportunities and the liquidation valu
e is small, then the credit contract must be state-dependent, However, if t
he worker is unable to precommit not to renegotiate with the firm, then the
credit contract must be state-independent to ensure renegotiation-proofnes
s and protect the interests of the creditor. This leads to credit rationing
and under-investment.