The effect of atropine in vasovagal syncope induced by head-up tilt testing

Citation
M. Santini et al., The effect of atropine in vasovagal syncope induced by head-up tilt testing, EUR HEART J, 20(23), 1999, pp. 1745-1751
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems
Journal title
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL
ISSN journal
0195668X → ACNP
Volume
20
Issue
23
Year of publication
1999
Pages
1745 - 1751
Database
ISI
SICI code
0195-668X(199912)20:23<1745:TEOAIV>2.0.ZU;2-B
Abstract
Aims This single-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled study was designed and undertaken to assess the efficacy of intravenous atropine administrati on on haemodynamic impairment induced by head-up tilt testing in patients w ith vasovagal syncope. Methods and Results One hundred and thirteen consecutive patients (62 male and 51 female, mean age 46.3 years) with recurrent syncope, no evidence of cardiac, neurological or metabolic disease and a positive head-up tilt test were included in the study. Within 2 weeks of the first head-up tilt test all patients underwent a second tilt test. During this second test, all pat ients were randomized to receive a bolus of either atropine (0.02 mg.kg(-1) ) or placebo (isotonic saline solution). The administration of atropine or placebo was performed at the onset of the haemodynamic modifications (heart rate and/or blood pressure fall) in conjunction with typical vasovagal pro dromal symptoms. Treatment was taken as effective when symptoms aborted and the test was completed. In 29 of 113 patients the second tilt test was neg ative and these patients were excluded from final data analysis. Forty-one patients received placebo, which was effective in nine cases (21.9%). Atrop ine was administered to 43 patients and was effective in 30 cases (69.7%, P <0.01 vs placebo). The effects of treatment were analysed further to consid er the haemodynamic patterns of tilt-induced vasovagal reflex. In the cardi o-inhibitory form, placebo was never effective (15 cases), while atropine w as effective in 15 of 18 cases (83.3%, P<0.001 vs placebo). In the vasodepr essor form, placebo was effective in nine of 26 patients (34.6%), while atr opine was effective in 15 of 25 cases (60.0%, no significant difference vs placebo). Conclusions Atropine is fully effective in the cardioinhibitory form of til t-induced vasovagal reflex, but is limited in the vasodepressor form. (C) 1 999 The European Society of Cardiology.