Prevalence of cervical cancer and feasibility of screening in rural China:a pilot study for the Shanxi Province Cervical Cancer Screening Study

Citation
J. Belinson et al., Prevalence of cervical cancer and feasibility of screening in rural China:a pilot study for the Shanxi Province Cervical Cancer Screening Study, INT J GYN C, 9(5), 1999, pp. 411-417
Citations number
18
Categorie Soggetti
Reproductive Medicine
Journal title
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER
ISSN journal
1048891X → ACNP
Volume
9
Issue
5
Year of publication
1999
Pages
411 - 417
Database
ISI
SICI code
1048-891X(199909/10)9:5<411:POCCAF>2.0.ZU;2-O
Abstract
For cervical cancer screening to be feasible in developing countries, it mu st be accurate, inexpensive, and easy to administer. We conducted a pilot s tudy in rural Shanxi Province, People's Republic of China, to determine dis ease prevalence and study feasibility in preparation for a large-scale comp arative trial of 6 screening tests. One-hundred and thirty-six nonpregnant women with no history of hysterectom y, pelvic radiation, or Papanicolaou tests were screened in a rural clinic. Ten percent of the women enrolled reported abnormal vaginal bleeding and 4 5% reported abnormal vaginal discharge. The tests were the Papanicolaou tes t (both conventional and ThinPrep), a self-administered swab test by Hybrid Capture II for high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV), a test for high-risk HPV from residual PreservCyt medium, fluorescence spectroscopy, and visual inspection of the cervix by a clinician. All women also underwent colposcop y and biopsies as the reference standard. Biopsies showed 12 of 136 women had greater than or equal to high-grade squ amous intraepithelial lesions (HGSIL). Screening was completed in 5 half-da y sessions, the procedures went smoothly, and local cooperation was enthusi astic. Disease prevalence in Xiangyuan and Yangcheng Counties, Shanxi Province, ca n be estimated at 8.8% (95% CI, 4.5% to 15.0%). Screening 1000-2000 patient s would be sufficient to detect a 10% difference in accuracy between diagno stic tests. The proposed large-scale trial is feasible.