A future alternative for generating winter electricity is the seasonal stor
age of surplus summer electricity in the form of chemically bound hydrogen
in liquid organic hydrocarbons using the MTH-system (Methylcyclohexane-Tolu
ene-Hydrogen), This paper compares the economics of the MTH-system with the
conventional production of electricity from fossil fuel sources.
Based on numerical modelling of the individual plants, simulations of sever
al design alternatives of the MTH-system were performed for 1000 GWh of sto
red summer electricity and so MW output, The overall efficiencies eta(tot)
and the economic results of these simulations are eta(tot) = 0.40 and 0.26
$/kWh for the MTH-SOFC system alternative, eta(tot) = 0,33 and 0.30 $/kWh f
or the MTH-MCFC and eta(tot) = 0.25 and 0.36 $/kWh for the MTH-system with
gas and steam turbines.
Compared with the cost of electricity production using fossil fuels (0.05-0
.1 $/kWh), the electricity produced by the MTH-system is expensive, Therefo
re an economic comparison including an assumed carbon tax was made to accou
nt:for a possible scarcity of energy or the environmental impact due to the
use of fossil energy resources. It concludes that the MTH-system is not co
mpetitive for the levels of carbon tax under discussion, but compares with
options for providing electricity from new renewables,
Due to the disparities in economics and carbon taxes, a best case study of
the MTH-system was made to reduce its economic disadvantages. This results
in a maximum efficiency of the MTH-system of 0.48 with corresponding winter
electricity costs of 0.17 $/kWh. (C) 1999 International Association for Hy
drogen Energy. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.