Purpose: The biaxial flexural strength and fracture toughness for 3 represe
ntative types of ceramic core materials were studied to iii ascertain the r
anking of the 3 ceramic types for strength and toughness, and (2) provide c
linicians with more information to predict clinical outcomes. The former ai
m was deemed important in view of the importance of flaw size in the relati
onship between failure stress and fracture toughness of brittle materials.
Materials and Methods: The 3 representative ceramic types included a leucit
e-reinforced glass, a glass-infiltrated sintered alumina, and a high-purity
, high-density alumina. The biaxial flexural strength was measured with the
piston-on-3-ball method. The plane-strain fracture toughness was measured
with the short-bar chevron-notch method. Results: The biaxial flexural stre
ngths of the high-purity, high-density alumina and glass-infiltrated sinter
ed alumina ceramic core types were significantly higher than that of the le
ucite-reinforced glass ceramic type. The glass-infiltrated sintered alumina
was significantly higher in fracture toughness than the high-purity, high-
density alumina type, which was significantly higher than the leucite-reinf
orced glass. Conclusion: All materials surpassed the minimum strength requi
rement outlined by the International Standards Organization, and they also
had similar strength variability according to their Weibull moduli. The gla
ss-infiltrated sintered alumina and the high-purity, high-density alumina t
ypes were significantly stronger and tougher than currently used core mater
ials. However, while the glass-infiltrated sintered alumina had a higher fr
acture toughness than the high-purity, high-density alumina, it had a lower
flexural strength.