Purpose. To determine the minimum acceptable exposure for an adequate image
quality using digital luminescence radiography (DLR) instead of screen-fil
m system (SFS).
Material and methods. The impact of different physical and technical parame
ters on image quality and exposure was evaluated by obtaining radiographs o
f a test phantom. Conventional and digital radiographs of a humanoid phanto
m, an anatomical preparation or an animal were obtained using variable mAs.
The image quality was rated by eight experienced radiologists using clinic
al criteria of image quality. The image quality evaluation was analysed usi
ng graphs.
Results. The exposure could be reduced by 60% for skull radiographs, 57% fo
r abdominal radiographs, and 25% for chest radiographs of premature infants
when using DLR instead of conventional SFS.
Conclusion. DLR provides adequate image quality with reasonably low exposur
e.