Triaxial sonic anemometer velocity measurements vertically arrayed at six l
evels within and above a pine forest were used to examine the performance o
f two second-order closure models put forth by Wilson and Shaw and by Wilso
n. Based on these measurements, it was demonstrated that Wilson's model rep
roduced the longitudinal velocity standard deviation sigma(u) better than d
id Wilson and Shaw's model. However, Wilson and Shaw's model reproduced the
measured mean velocity tit) near the forest-atmosphere interface better th
an Wilson's model did. The primary mechanisms responsible for discrepancies
between modeled and measured [u] and sigma(u) profiles were investigated.
The conceptual formulations of these two closure models differ in the chara
cteristic length scales and timescales used in the closure parameterization
s of the mean turbulent kinetic energy dissipation rate term, the pressure-
strain rate term, and the flux-transport term. These characteristic length
scales were computed and compared with measured integral length scales insi
de the canopy. A discussion on how these length scales compare with the mix
ing layer analogy also is presented.