Ka. Covalciuc et al., Comparison of four clinical specimen types for detection of influenza A and B viruses by optical immunoassay (FLU OIA test) and cell culture methods, J CLIN MICR, 37(12), 1999, pp. 3971-3974
Although laboratory diagnosis of respiratory viruses has been widely studie
d, there is a relative insufficiency of literature examining the impact of
specimen type on the laboratory diagnosis of influenza A and B. In a clinic
al study comparing the FLU OIA test with I l-day cell culture, clinical spe
cimens from nasopharyngeal swabs, throat swabs, nasal aspirates, and sputum
were obtained from patients experiencing influenza-like symptoms. A total
of 404 clinical specimens were collected from 184 patients. Patients were d
efined as influenza positive if the viral culture of a specimen from any sa
mple site was positive. Patients were defined as influenza negative if the
viral cultures of specimens from all sample sites were negative. By this go
ld standard, culture and FLU OIA test results for each sample type were com
pared. For each of the four specimen types, the viral culture and FLU OIA t
est demonstrated equal abilities to detect the presence of influenza A or B
virus or viral antigen. Sputum and nasal aspirate samples were the most pr
edictive of influenza virus infection. Throat swabs were the least predicti
ve of influenza virus infection, with both tests failing to detect influenz
a virus in nearly 50% of the throat samples studied.