International study of expert judgment on therapeutic use of benzodiazepines and other psychotherapeutic medications: IV. Therapeutic dose dependenceand abuse liability of benzodiazepines in the long-term treatment of anxiety disorders
Eh. Uhlenhuth et al., International study of expert judgment on therapeutic use of benzodiazepines and other psychotherapeutic medications: IV. Therapeutic dose dependenceand abuse liability of benzodiazepines in the long-term treatment of anxiety disorders, J CL PSYCH, 19(6), 1999, pp. 23S-29S
Despite decades of relevant basic and clinical research, active debate cont
inues about the appropriate extent and duration of benzodiazepine use in th
e treatment of anxiety and related disorders. The primary basis of the cont
roversy seems to be concern among clinicians, regulators, and the public ab
out the dependence potential and the abuse liability of benzodiazepines. Th
is article reports systematically elicited judgments on these issues by a r
epresentative panel of 73 internationally recognized experts in the pharmac
otherapy of anxiety and depressive disorders, a panel which was constituted
by a multistage process of peer nomination. The criterion for inclusion at
each stage was the nomination by at least two peers as one of the "profess
ionally most respected physicians of the world with extensive experience an
d knowledge in the pharmacotherapy of anxiety and depressive disorders." Si
xty-six respondents (90%) completed a comprehensive questionnaire covering
a wide range of topics relevant to the therapeutic use of benzodiazepines a
nd other medications that might be used for the same purposes. Overall, the
expert panel judged that benzodiazepines pose a higher risk of dependence
and abuse than most potential substitutes but a lower risk than older sedat
ives and recognized drugs of abuse. There was Little consensus about the re
lative risk of dependence and abuse among the benzodiazepines. Differences
between benzodiazepines with shorter and longer half-lives in inducing with
drawal symptoms are much less clear during tapered than during abrupt disco
ntinuation. There was little agreement about the most important factors con
tributing to withdrawal symptoms and failure to discontinue benzodiazepines
. The pharmacologic properties of the medication may be the most important
contributors to withdrawal symptoms. In contrast, the clinical characterist
ics of the patient may be the most important contributors to failure to dis
continue medication. The experts' judgment seems to support the widespread
use of benzodiazepines for the treatment of bona fide anxiety disorders, ev
en over long periods. The experts generally viewed dependence and abuse lia
bility as clinical issues amenable to appropriate management, as for other
adverse events related to therapy. However, more definitive clinical resear
ch on the remaining controversial issues is urgently needed to promote opti
mal patient care.