Ja. Cadeddu et al., Retroperitoneal access for transperitoneal laparoscopy in patients at highrisk for intra-abdominal scarring, J ENDOUROL, 13(8), 1999, pp. 567-570
Background and Purpose: Adhesions from prior extensive open abdominal surge
ry can make initial transperitoneal access for laparoscopy hazardous. An al
ternative to open port placement is a retroperitoneal approach to the perit
oneal cavity, We describe our retroperitoneal access for transperitoneal la
paroscopy and evaluate the success of the subsequent laparoscopic procedure
.
Patients and Methods: Eight patients with a history of abdominal surgery ha
ve undergone retroperitoneal access to the peritoneum prior to a laparoscop
ic urologic procedure. With the patient in a lateral decubitus position, th
e retroperitoneum is entered with a 10-mm Visiport device (US Surgical Corp
., Norwalk, CT) along the posterior axillary line, A working space is blunt
ly created, the peritoneum identified anterior to the colon, and the endosc
ope passed through a peritoneotomy, The abdomen is then inspected, transper
itoneal ports are strategically placed under direct vision, and the intende
d procedure is commenced.
Results: In all cases, retroperitoneal access to the peritoneum and subsequ
ent trocar placement was successful. In five cases, the intended procedure
was completed laparoscopically, In a case of bilateral ureterolysis, one si
de was completed laparoscopically; however, the other required open convers
ion. In two nephrectomies for xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis (XGP), ope
n conversion was necessary because of fibrosis.
Conclusion: Retroperitoneal access to the peritoneal cavity permits safe an
d effective port placement when previous abdominal surgery makes initial tr
ansabdominal access difficult. However, despite successful access, in patie
nts at risk for extensive perinephric fibrosis (e.g., XGP), a high incidenc
e of open conversion may be expected.