The preparation and on-line control of short, rapid sequential aiming respo
nses were studied in 3 experiments. Participants (N = 12 in Experiments 1 a
nd 2, and 20 in Experiment 3) produced 3-segment responses (a) within self-
initiation, simple reaction time (RT), and choice RT paradigms (Experiment
1); (b) without visual feedback under self-initiation conditions (Experimen
t 2); and (c) with and without visual feedback under simple RT conditions (
Experiment 3). In all conditions in which participants initiated movement i
n response to an external imperative signal, the 2nd response segment was p
erformed consistently slower than preceding and succeeding response segment
s. That pattern of segmental movement times was found whether or not visual
feedback was available but was not evident when participants self-initiate
d their responses with or without visual feedback. The findings rule out th
e possibility that subjects' use of visual feedback is responsible for the
slowing of the 2nd response segment under RT conditions and suggest that th
e programming of rapid sequential aiming responses can be distributed in pr
e- and postinitiation intervals.