A small set-of studies that will be called the high-point code system studi
es has contributed greatly to the perception of the MMPI as an empirically
grounded clinical instrument. Ten published studies have provided data conc
erning the interpretive significance of high-point codes in general. This a
rticle provides a methodological evaluation of these studies. We reviewed t
he features that distinguish these studies from other MMPI actuarial studie
s. The high-point code system studies were designed to maximize clinical us
efulness, more so than even other actuarial Studies, but sometimes did so a
t a potential cost in power. We address this issue further in a second arti
cle on effect sizes derived from the high-point code system studies (McGrat
h & Ingersoll, this issue). We found striking differences across studies in
the code-definition strategies used. Which strategy represents the optimal
high-point coding strategy for clinicians who use the MMPI remains an unre
solved question because any strategy requires some tradeoff between the ide
als of code group homogeneity and inclusiveness. We also address the issue
of whether complete description or unique description of code group members
is a more desirable goal for such studies and discuss implications of the
findings for future research on this topic.