Fh. Wapstra et al., Dose of doxorubicin determines severity of renal damage and responsivenessto ACE-inhibition in experimental nephrosis, J PHARM TOX, 41(2-3), 1999, pp. 69-73
Citations number
27
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology & Toxicology
Journal title
JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGICAL AND TOXICOLOGICAL METHODS
Nephrosis induced by doxorubicin (adriamycin) is an experimental model of g
lomerulosclerosis with relative stable proteinuria which is commonly used f
or pharmacological intervention studies. It is induced by a single or a dou
ble dose of doxorubicin, with doses that vary considerably among investigat
ors from 2 to 7.5 mg/kg. Intervention studies with ACE-inhibitors in this m
odel have provided conflicting results. We hypothesized that these discrepa
ncies might be due to different properties of the doxorubicin model, relate
d to the dose of doxorubicin used to induce proteinuria. We tested this hyp
othesis by inducing doxorubicin nephrosis with 1, 2 and 3 mg/kg, and evalua
ting the response to intervention with lisinopril. The 1-mg/kg doxorubicin
dose did not induce significant proteinuria. The 2- and the 3-mg/kg dose re
sulted in a proteinuria of 684+/-215 mg/24 h and 736+/-277 mg/24 h 6 weeks
after induction, respectively (Mean+/-SD). Treatment with lisinopril 2 mg/k
g/day reduced proteinuria to 160+/-170 mg/24 h(p<0.01) in the 2-mg/kg doxor
ubicin group, whereas in the 3-mg/kg doxorubicin group, proteinuria did not
respond to lisinopril (529+/-264 mg/24 h). In time control rats, proteinur
ia remained stable. Renal damage developed in both time control groups, wit
h a glomerulosclerosis score of 29+/-22 in the 2-mg/kg group and 84+/-41 in
the 3-mg/kg doxorubicin group. Lisinopril resulted in a significantly lowe
r glomerulosclerosis score in the 2-mg/kg doxorubicin group only (16+/-15,
p<0.05), whereas the 3-mg/kg group showed no significant reduction (56+/-29
, NS). In conclusion, the dose of doxorubicin used to induce nephrosis is a
n important determinant not only of the severity of the ensuring renal dama
ge, but also of the response to intervention by ACE-inhibition. These findi
ngs have an impact on the interpretation of intervention studies in this mo
del. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Inc.