D. Lucidarme et al., EFFICACY AND TOLERANCE OF MESALAZINE SUPPOSITORIES VS HYDROCORTISONE FOAM IN PROCTITIS, Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics, 11(2), 1997, pp. 335-340
Background: Topical treatments with steroids or mesalazine are the mos
t effective treatments for idiopathic proctitis, Aim: to compare the e
fficacy and tolerance of mesalazine suppositories vs, hydrocortisone a
cetate foam in the treatment of acute proctitis, Patients and methods:
242 patients with active idiopathic proctitis were randomized to rece
ive once daily either one Pentasa suppository (mesalazine 1 g) or 100
mg hydrocortisone (Colofoam) for 14-21 days (until remission). Disease
activity and tolerance of the treatments were assessed using a daily
questionnaire, by physician assessment, and endoscopy score. Results:
Both treatments induced a significant reduction in disease activity. M
esalazine suppositories were significantly more effective than hydroco
rtisone on rectal blood loss (P = 0.002) and mucus (P = 0.02) paramete
rs, and on the degree of the decrease in endoscopy score (P = 0.02), N
o significant difference was observed between treatments concerning hi
stology or tolerance. Conclusion: Mesalazine suppositories were as wel
l-tolerated as hydrocortisone foam, but were more effective for some p
arameters of disease activity.