Hw. Neighbors et al., Psychiatric diagnosis of African Americans: Diagnostic divergence in clinician-structured and semistructured interviewing conditions, J NAT MED A, 91(11), 1999, pp. 601-612
This study is a primary data collection that varied patient race and diagno
sis and used two diagnostic interviewing conditions: one clinician-structur
ed (phase one) and the other a semi-tructured diagnostic instrument (phase
two). Four basic research questions are addressed: What is the relationship
between race and the hospital diagnosis? How is race related to diagnosis
in both research interviewing conditions? Why does diagnostic concordance b
etween the hospital diagnosis and the research diagnosis vary by research i
nterviewing condition? Is diagnostic concordance between he hospital and re
search diagnosis influenced by patient race? A total of 291 patients comple
ted an interview during phase one, while 665 patients completed an intervie
w during phase two. Blacks were more likely to receive a hospital diagnosis
of schizophrenia and less likely to be diagnosed with mood disorder. Patie
nt race was similarly related to the research diagnoses produced in the cli
nician-structured research condition (phase one). Although less pronounced,
a higher percentage of African Americans than whites received a diagnosis
of schizophrenia using the semi-structured DSM-III-R Symptom Checklist (pha
se two). The black-white distribution for mood disorders showed that whites
were more likely than blacks to be diagnosed with mood disorder.