Psychiatric diagnosis of African Americans: Diagnostic divergence in clinician-structured and semistructured interviewing conditions

Citation
Hw. Neighbors et al., Psychiatric diagnosis of African Americans: Diagnostic divergence in clinician-structured and semistructured interviewing conditions, J NAT MED A, 91(11), 1999, pp. 601-612
Citations number
64
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine
Journal title
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
ISSN journal
00279684 → ACNP
Volume
91
Issue
11
Year of publication
1999
Pages
601 - 612
Database
ISI
SICI code
0027-9684(199911)91:11<601:PDOAAD>2.0.ZU;2-M
Abstract
This study is a primary data collection that varied patient race and diagno sis and used two diagnostic interviewing conditions: one clinician-structur ed (phase one) and the other a semi-tructured diagnostic instrument (phase two). Four basic research questions are addressed: What is the relationship between race and the hospital diagnosis? How is race related to diagnosis in both research interviewing conditions? Why does diagnostic concordance b etween the hospital diagnosis and the research diagnosis vary by research i nterviewing condition? Is diagnostic concordance between he hospital and re search diagnosis influenced by patient race? A total of 291 patients comple ted an interview during phase one, while 665 patients completed an intervie w during phase two. Blacks were more likely to receive a hospital diagnosis of schizophrenia and less likely to be diagnosed with mood disorder. Patie nt race was similarly related to the research diagnoses produced in the cli nician-structured research condition (phase one). Although less pronounced, a higher percentage of African Americans than whites received a diagnosis of schizophrenia using the semi-structured DSM-III-R Symptom Checklist (pha se two). The black-white distribution for mood disorders showed that whites were more likely than blacks to be diagnosed with mood disorder.