Effect of ultrasound transducer frequency on the appearance of the fetal bowel

Citation
Ns. Vincoff et al., Effect of ultrasound transducer frequency on the appearance of the fetal bowel, J ULTR MED, 18(12), 1999, pp. 799-803
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology ,Nuclear Medicine & Imaging
Journal title
JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE
ISSN journal
02784297 → ACNP
Volume
18
Issue
12
Year of publication
1999
Pages
799 - 803
Database
ISI
SICI code
0278-4297(199912)18:12<799:EOUTFO>2.0.ZU;2-M
Abstract
We evaluated how ultrasound transducer frequency affected the appearance of the fetal bowel. One hundred women with singleton pregnancies, who were un dergoing routine ultrasonographic examination, were assessed at a single in stitution. Patients with known fetal anomalies, abnormal biochemical screen ing results, or a history of cystic fibrosis were excluded. Images of the f etal abdomen were obtained in all patients using a single multi-Hertz trans ducer, with transducer frequencies set at 5 MHz and 8 MHz. Images were read separately by two radiologists, blinded to patient name and transducer fre quency. Observers rated the presence or absence of echogenic bowel, defined as bowel with echogenicity greater than or equal to that of adjacent bone. Using the 8 MHz frequency, the radiologists interpreted 31% of the cases a s having echogenic bowel, whereas using the 5 MHz frequency, the radiologis ts interpreted only 3% of the cases as having echogenic bowel (P < 0.0001). A fetus was 10 times as likely to be given a diagnosis of echogenic bowel by both observers when the 8 MHz transducer was used than when the 5MHz tra nsducer was used by one observer (relative risk 10, 95% CE 3-11). Furthermo re, using the 8 MHz frequency transducer, at least one of the radiologists interpreted echogenic bowel in 62% of the cases. We concluded that echogeni c fetal bowel is a very common observation when imaging is performed with a n 8 MHz transducer, and thus echogenic bowel diagnosed with an 8 MHz transd ucer is unlikely to reflect underlying abnormality. Identification of echog enic bowel with an 8 MHz transducer should not prompt further testing.