Contrasting spatial hearing deficits in hemianopia and spatial neglect

Citation
G. Kerkhoff et al., Contrasting spatial hearing deficits in hemianopia and spatial neglect, NEUROREPORT, 10(17), 1999, pp. 3555-3560
Citations number
36
Categorie Soggetti
Neurosciences & Behavoir
Journal title
NEUROREPORT
ISSN journal
09594965 → ACNP
Volume
10
Issue
17
Year of publication
1999
Pages
3555 - 3560
Database
ISI
SICI code
0959-4965(19991126)10:17<3555:CSHDIH>2.0.ZU;2-#
Abstract
SPATIAL hearing deficits have been described in widely differing pathologie s, including bilateral temporal or unilateral parietal lesions, hemispherec tomy, spatial neglect and right-sided cortical lesions without neglect. How ever, the topography of spatial hearing deficits after cortical lesions is only poorly understood, unlike that of vision and touch. We investigated th e auditory subjective straight ahead (SSA) with a new technique of binaural sound source simulation using broad-band single pulses which were filtered with head-related transfer functions and delivered with a 5 degrees resolu tion over headphones in front space. Normal subjects showed quite accurate judgments of the SSA, with a small but significant shift to the left of cen tre (-1.7 degrees) in the horizontal plane. Hemineglect without a scotoma, produced a large ipsilesional deviation of the auditory SSA (+22 degrees), while two hemianopic subjects, both without neglect, showed the opposite de viation of their perceived auditory SSA towards their contralesional, blind hemifield (+10 vs -28 degrees). TWO control patients with unilateral lesio ns, both without neglect and without hemianopia, produced normal judgments of their auditory SSA (-3.0 degrees, +3.8 degrees). These results suggest a t least two contrasting influences on directional spatial hearing after uni lateral cortical lesions: hemianopia vs hemispatial neglect. The results ar e interpreted in favour of multisensory convergence of visual and auditory information in directional spatial hearing. (C) 1999 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.