Dr. Mildvan and coauthors have thoroughly reviewed and documented what
is known about the validation of surrogate markers for use in clinica
l trials, They have proposed a classification system based on the usef
ulness of available immunologic and virological assays as measures of
prognosis, drug activity, and therapeutic efficacy. The latter, a type
II marker in the proposed classification, should estimate the proport
ion of treatment effect explained by change in the marker induced by t
herapy and, if complete, can substitute for clinical endpoints, HIV cl
inical trialists have had a long-standing interest in using surrogates
for clinical endpoints to facilitate conduct of experimental protocol
s and to decrease the time and effort required to develop new treatmen
t strategies, The approach outlined in this review by experienced clin
icians, biostatisticians, and immunologists provides a framework to ev
aluate currently available and potential surrogate markers.