Did knowledge, opinions, background, and health authority advice influenceearly prescribing of the novel Alzheimer's disease drug donepezil in general practice? National postal survey

Citation
Rm. Martin et al., Did knowledge, opinions, background, and health authority advice influenceearly prescribing of the novel Alzheimer's disease drug donepezil in general practice? National postal survey, PHARMA D S, 8(6), 1999, pp. 413-422
Citations number
35
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology
Journal title
PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY
ISSN journal
10538569 → ACNP
Volume
8
Issue
6
Year of publication
1999
Pages
413 - 422
Database
ISI
SICI code
1053-8569(199910/11)8:6<413:DKOBAH>2.0.ZU;2-9
Abstract
Background - Donepezil was licensed in the UK in February 1997 for the trea tment of Alzheimer's disease. Aims - To determine the advice from health authorities about prescribing Al zheimer's disease drugs. To determine whether the first general practitione rs who prescribed donepezil in England differed from non-prescribers in ter ms of knowledge, opinions, background, and the prescribing-advice issued by their health authority, Methods - National postal survey of pharmaceutical advisors. Structured pos tal survey of all general practitioners in England who prescribed donepezil to two or more patients within the first 6 months of launch, compared with a random sample of non-prescribers. Results - Pharmaceutical advisors' survey: 75/100 pharmaceutical advisors r esponded, of whom 83% indicated that general practitioners should not initi ate prescribing of Alzheimer's disease drugs and 63% said that they should not prescribe, even under shared care arrangements. General practitioner su rvey: 311/473 (66%) prescribers and 484/947 (51%) non-prescribers responded after two mailings. Prescribers were similar to non-prescribers in terms o f demographic and practice characteristics, knowledge about Alzheimer's dis ease, diagnostic and initial management strategies, and the prescribing adv ice from health authorities. Prescribers were significantly more likely tha n non-prescribers to strongly agree/agree that new drugs should be prescrib ed for mild (p = 0.0008) and moderate (p = 0.003) Alzheimer's disease, that they should normally be initiated (p = 0.003) and monitored by a general p ractitioner (p < 0.0001), and that financial constraints should not be a co nsideration (p = 0.0001). Conclusion - Early prescribers differed from non-prescribers in their opini ons about using Alzheimer's disease drugs. Future research should examine m ethods to promote nationally equitable and rational prescribing of new drug s. Copyright (C) 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.